The Multiple Lenses on the Community Health System: Implications for Policy, Practice and Research

Document Type : Short Communication

Authors

1 SAMRC Health Services to Systems Research Unit, School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

2 School of Public Health & Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

3 School of Public Health, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

4 Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

5 School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

6 A full list of the investigators of the Chaminuka Collective is provided at the end of the article

Abstract

Community health systems (CHSs) have historically been approached from multiple perspectives, with different purposes and methodological and disciplinary orientations. The terrain is, on the one hand, vast and diverse. On the other hand, under the banner of universal health coverage (UHC) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), a streamlined version of ‘community health’ is increasingly being consolidated in global health and donor communities. With the view to informing debate and practice, this paper seeks to synthesise approaches to the CHS into a set of ‘lenses,’ drawing on the collective and multi-disciplinary knowledge (both formal and experiential) of the authors, a collaborative network of 23 researchers from seven institutions across six countries (spanning low, middle and high income). With a common view of the CHS as a complex adaptive system, we propose four key lenses, referred to as programmatic, relational, collective action and critical lenses. The lenses represent different positionalities in community health, encompassing macro-level policy- maker, front-line and community vantage points, and purposes ranging from social justice to instrumental goals. We define and describe the main elements of each lens and their implications for thinking about policy, practice and research. Distilling a set of key lenses offers a way to make sense of a complex terrain, but also counters what may emerge as a dominant, single narrative on the CHS in global health. By making explicit and bringing together different lenses on the CHS, the limits and possibilities of each may be better appreciated, while promoting integrative, systems thinking in policy, practice and research.

Keywords

Full Text

 

"Watch the Video Summary"

 

  Check the full list of "CHS-Connect" special issue here. 

References

  1. Maher D, Cometto G. Research on community-based health workers is needed to achieve the sustainable development goals. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(11):786. doi:10.2471/blt.16.185918
  2. Global Fund. Technical Brief: Community Systems Strengthening. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Fund; 2019.
  3. Boydell V, McMullen H, Cordero J, Steyn P, Kiare J. Studying social accountability in the context of health system strengthening: innovations and considerations for future work. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):34. doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0438-x
  4. Barker KM, Ling EJ, Fallah M, et al. Community engagement for health system resilience: evidence from Liberia's Ebola epidemic. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(4):416-423. doi:10.1093/heapol/czz174
  5. Shiffman J. Knowledge, moral claims and the exercise of power in global health. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(6):297-299. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2014.120
  6. Tulenko K, Møgedal S, Afzal MM, et al. Community health workers for universal health-care coverage: from fragmentation to synergy. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(11):847-852. doi:10.2471/blt.13.118745
  7. Bennett S, George A, Rodriguez D, et al. Policy challenges facing integrated community case management in sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2014;19(7):872-882. doi:10.1111/tmi.12319
  8. 8 Abimbola S. Beyond positive a priori bias: reframing community engagement in LMICs. Health Promot Int. 2020;35(3):598-609. doi:10.1093/heapro/daz023
  9. George AS, LeFevre AE, Schleiff M, Mancuso A, Sacks E, Sarriot E. Hubris, humility and humanity: expanding evidence approaches for improving and sustaining community health programmes. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(3):e000811. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000811
  10. Agarwal S, Kirk K, Sripad P, Bellows B, Abuya T, Warren C. Setting the global research agenda for community health systems: literature and consultative review. Human Resour Health. 2019;17(1):22. doi:10.1186/s12960-019-0362-8
  11. Brunton G, Thomas J, O'Mara-Eves A, Jamal F, Oliver S, Kavanagh J. Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):944. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4958-4
  12. Schneider H, Lehmann U. From community health workers to community health systems: time to widen the horizon? Health Syst Reform. 2016;2(2):112-118. doi:10.1080/23288604.2016.1166307
  13. George AS, Scott K, Mehra V, Sriram V. Synergies, strengths and challenges: findings on community capability from a systematic health systems research literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(Suppl 7):623. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1860-1
  14. Sacks E, Morrow M, Story WT, et al. Beyond the building blocks: integrating community roles into health systems frameworks to achieve health for all. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 3):e001384. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001384
  15. Lenses, Metaphors and Research Priorities on Community Health Systems. Report of a workshop held at the Chaminuka Lodge, Lusaka, Zambia 10-14 June 2019. https://www.uwcsoph.co.za/. 
  16. Campbell C. Community mobilisation in the 21st century: updating our theory of social change? J Health Psychol. 2014;19(1):46-59. doi:10.1177/1359105313500262
  17. Republic of Zambia. Community Health Strategy 2017-2021. Zambia: Ministry of Health; 2017.
  18. McCollum R, Otiso L, Mireku M, et al. Exploring perceptions of community health policy in Kenya and identifying implications for policy change. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(1):10-20. doi:10.1093/heapol/czv007
  19. Angwenyi V, Aantjes C, Kondowe K, et al. Moving to a strong(er) community health system: analysing the role of community health volunteers in the new national community health strategy in Malawi. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(Suppl 3):e000996. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000996
  20. USAID. Community Health Framework: Distilling decades of Agency experience to drive 2030 Global Goals. USAID; 2015. https://www.chwcentral.org/sites/default/files/USAID-Community-Health-Framework_Version-1-0_October-28th-2015.pdf.
  21. Republic of Malawi. National Community Health Strategy 2017-2022. Malawi: Ministry of Health; 2017.
  22. Sarriot E, Kouletio M. Community health systems as complex adaptive systems: ontology and praxis lessons from an urban health experience with demonstrated sustainability. Syst Pract Action Res. 2015;28(3):255-272. doi:10.1007/s11213-014-9329-9
  23. Ved R, Scott K, Gupta G, et al. How are gender inequalities facing India's one million ASHAs being addressed? policy origins and adaptations for the world's largest all-female community health worker programme. Hum Resour Health. 2019;17(1):3. doi:10.1186/s12960-018-0338-0
  24. Assegaai T, Schneider H. The supervisory relationships of community health workers in primary health care: social network analysis of ward-based outreach teams in Ngaka Modiri Molema district, South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(6):e001839. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001839
  25. Mishra A. 'Trust and teamwork matter': community health workers' experiences in integrated service delivery in India. Glob Public Health. 2014;9(8):960-974. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.934877
  26. Zulu JM, Kinsman J, Michelo C, Hurtig AK. Hope and despair: community health assistants' experiences of working in a rural district in Zambia. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12:30. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-12-30
  27. Scott K, Shanker S. Tying their hands? institutional obstacles to the success of the ASHA community health worker programme in rural north India. AIDS Care. 2010;22 Suppl 2:1606-1612. doi:10.1080/09540121.2010.507751
  28. Kok MC, Namakhoma I, Nyirenda L, et al. Health surveillance assistants as intermediates between the community and health sector in Malawi: exploring how relationships influence performance. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:164. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1402-x
  29. Lehmann U, Gilson L. Actor interfaces and practices of power in a community health worker programme: a South African study of unintended policy outcomes. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(4):358-366. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs066
  30. Gram L, Daruwalla N, Osrin D. Understanding participation dilemmas in community mobilisation: can collective action theory help? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019;73(1):90-96. doi:10.1136/jech-2018-211045
  31. Lunsford SS, Fatta K, Stover KE, Shrestha R. Supporting close-to-community providers through a community health system approach: case examples from Ethiopia and Tanzania. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:12. doi:10.1186/s12960-015-0006-6
  32. Muhumuza Kananura R, Tetui M, Bua J, et al. Effect of a participatory multisectoral maternal and newborn intervention on birth preparedness and knowledge of maternal and newborn danger signs among women in Eastern Uganda: a quasi-experiment study. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(Suppl 4):1362826. doi:10.1080/16549716.2017.1362826
  33. Zulu JM, Kinsman J, Hurtig AK, Michelo C, George A, Schneider H. Integrating community health assistant-driven sexual and reproductive health services in the community health system in Nyimba district in Zambia: mapping key actors, points of integration, and conditions shaping the process. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):122. doi:10.1186/s12978-019-0788-4
  34. Ahmad H. The Treatment Action Campaign and the three dimensions of lawyering: reflections from the rainbow nation. SAHARA J. 2013;10(1):17-24. doi:10.1080/17290376.2013.807067
  35. Heywood M. South Africa's Treatment Action Campaign: combining law and social mobilization to realize the right to health. J Hum Rights Pract. 2009;1(1):14-36. doi:10.1093/jhuman/hun006
  36. Worrall H, Schweizer R, Marks E, Yuan L, Lloyd C, Ramjan R. The effectiveness of support groups: a literature review. Ment Health Soc Incl. 2018;22(2):85-93. doi:10.1108/mhsi-12-2017-0055
  37. Ghose T, Swendeman D, George S, Chowdhury D. Mobilizing collective identity to reduce HIV risk among sex workers in Sonagachi, India: the boundaries, consciousness, negotiation framework. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(2):311-320. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.045
  38. van Zomeren M, Postmes T, Spears R. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychol Bull. 2008;134(4):504-535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
  39. Ichoku HE, Ifelunini AI. The changing political undercurrents in health services delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Health Serv. 2017;47(3):489-503. doi:10.1177/0020731416660964
  40. Fox AM, Reich MR. The politics of universal health coverage in low- and middle-income countries: a framework for evaluation and action. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015;40(5):1023-1060. doi:10.1215/03616878-3161198
  41. Baum F, Freeman T, Sanders D, Labonté R, Lawless A, Javanparast S. Comprehensive primary health care under neo-liberalism in Australia. Soc Sci Med. 2016;168:43-52. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.005
  42. The Global Fund. Project Last Mile: The Coca-Cola Company. https://www.coca-colacompany.com/project-last-mile. Published 2019.
  43. Winters N, O'Donovan J, Geniets A. A new era for community health in countries of low and middle income? Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(5):e489-e490. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30072-x
  44. USAID and Center for Accelerating Innovation and Impact. Unleashing Private Capital for Global Health Innovation: Innovator and Investor Support Opportunities. https://issuu.com/usaidgh/docs/usaid_private_captial_508. Published 2019.
  45. Béland D. Kingdon reconsidered: ideas, interests and institutions in comparative policy analysis. J Comp Policy Anal Res Pract. 2016;18(3):228-242. doi:10.1080/13876988.2015.1029770
  46. Baum FE, Sanders DM, Fisher M, et al. Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: its importance and a framework. Global Health. 2016;12(1):27. doi:10.1186/s12992-016-0164-x
  47. Madureira Lima J, Galea S. Corporate practices and health: a framework and mechanisms. Global Health. 2018;14(1):21. doi:10.1186/s12992-018-0336-y
  48. Schneider H, Maleka N. Patterns of authorship on community health workers in low-and-middle-income countries: an analysis of publications (2012-2016). BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(3):e000797. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000797
  49. Richardson ET, McGinnis T, Frankfurter R. Ebola and the narrative of mistrust. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(6):e001932. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001932
  50. Maes K. "Volunteers are not paid because they are priceless": community health worker capacities and values in an AIDS treatment intervention in urban Ethiopia. Med Anthropol Q. 2015;29(1):97-115. doi:10.1111/maq.12136
  51. McCollum R, Taegtmeyer M, Otiso L, et al. Applying an intersectionality lens to examine health for vulnerable individuals following devolution in Kenya. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):24. doi:10.1186/s12939-019-0917-2
  52. Gaitonde R, Muraleedharan VR, San Sebastian M, Hurtig AK. Accountability in the health system of Tamil Nadu, India: exploring its multiple meanings. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):44. doi:10.1186/s12961-019-0448-8

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 12 July 2020
  • Revise Date: 18 February 2021
  • Accept Date: 23 June 2021
  • First Publish Date: 07 July 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics