“A Promise Unfulfilled”: Stakeholder Influence and the 2018 UN High-Level Meeting on NCDs; Comment on “Competing Frames in Global Health Governance: An Analysis of Stakeholder Influence on the Political Declaration on Non-communicable Diseases”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

World Obesity Federation, London, UK

Abstract

In recognition of the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the past decade has seen three United Nations High-Level Meetings (UN HLMs) on NCDs. Yet progress in terms of political or financial commitments has been very slow. At the 2018 meeting, a political declaration was approved but featured language that had been watered down in terms of commitments. In “Competing Frames of Global Health Governance: An Analysis of Stakeholder Influence on the Political Declaration on Non-communicable Diseases,” Suzuki et al analyze the documents that were submitted by Member States, non-governmental organizations and the private sector during the consultation period and conclude that the private sector and several high-income countries (HICs) appeared to oppose regulatory frameworks for products associated with NCDs, that wealthier countries resisted financing commitments, and that general power asymmetries affected the final document. This comment supports their findings and provides additional considerations for why the NCD response has yet to produce significant commitments.

Keywords


  1. UN Secretary General. A/72/662. Progress on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases. New York: UN Secretary General; 2017.
  2. Suzuki M, Webb D, Small R. Competing frames in global health governance: an analysis of stakeholder influence on the political declaration on non-communicable diseases. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021. doi:34172/ijhpm.2020.257
  3. Thompson R, Garry S. The political economy of NCDs, and the limits of global health. Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1186-1187. doi:1016/s0140-6736(19)30432-5
  4. UN Secretary General. A/RES/68/300. Outcome Document of the High-Level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Comprehensive Review and Assessment of the Progress Achieved in the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases. New York: UN Secretary General; 2014.
  5. Nugent RA, Feigl AB. Where Have All the Donors Gone? Scarce Donor Funding for Non-Communicable Diseases. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development; 2010. http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/1424546www.cgdev.org.
  6. Jailobaeva K, Falconer J, Loffreda G, Arakelyan S, Witter S, Ager A. An analysis of policy and funding priorities of global actors regarding noncommunicable disease in low- and middle-income countries. Global Health. 2021;17(1):68. doi:1186/s12992-021-00713-4
  7. UN Secretary General. A/RES/73/2. Political Declaration of the 3rd High-Level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases. New York: UN Secretary General; 2018.
  8. Abimbola S, Asthana S, Montenegro C, et al. Addressing power asymmetries in global health: imperatives in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS Med. 2021;18(4):e1003604. doi:1371/journal.pmed.1003604
  9. Nugent R, Fottrell E. Non-communicable diseases and climate change: linked global emergencies. Lancet. 2019;394(10199):622-623. doi:1016/s0140-6736(19)31762-3
Volume 11, Issue 7
July 2022
Pages 1225-1227
  • Receive Date: 22 July 2021
  • Revise Date: 28 September 2021
  • Accept Date: 02 October 2021
  • First Publish Date: 03 October 2021