The Economic Value of Non-professional Care: A Europe-Wide Analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Faculty of Law and Social Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain

Abstract

Background 
This paper had two aims. Firstly, to provide a broader view of the profile of non-professional caregivers in Europe, and secondly, to estimate the economic value of the non-professional caregiving.

Methods 
The European Quality of Life Survey 2016/2017, carried out by Eurofound, was used. The target population of the survey was adults who care for a relative or friend in a total of 33 European countries. The opportunity cost method was used to estimate the economic value of caregiving, in which two of the activities forgone were analysed: paid activities (restricted to caregivers who were employed), for which the average gross wage of each country was used; and unpaid activities, for which the minimum gross wage of each country was used.

Results 
There were more than 76 million non-professional caregivers in Europe that provide care for a relative or friend. This figure represents 12.7% of the population in Europe. The estimated time devoted to non-professional care in Europe reached 72 301.5 million hours in 2016. Sharp differences were found among countries. The economic value of that time is estimated at 576 000 million of euros, which represented about 3.63% of Europe’s gross domestic product (GDP).

Conclusion 
This study shows the very important number of resources dedicated to the non-professional care of dependent people and their economic valuation. These results may be helpful in prospective analyses estimating future needs on professional and non-professional and for designing of long-term care (LTC) policies in Europe.

Keywords


  1. Arrow KJ. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev. 1963;53(5):941-973.
  2. Cutler DM, Zeckhauser RJ. The anatomy of health insurance. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2000:563-643. doi:1016/s1574-0064(00)80170-5
  3. Arnott RJ, Stiglitz JE. The basic analytics of moral hazard. Scand J Econ. 1988;90(3):383-413. doi:2307/3440315
  4. McGuire TG. Demand for health insurance. In: Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.
  5. French E, Jones JB. On the distribution and dynamics of health care costs. J Appl Econ. 2004;19(6):705-721. doi:1002/jae.790
  6. Grabowski DC, Gruber J. Moral Hazard in Nursing Home Use. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., NBER Working Papers. 2005.
  7. Jiménez-Martín S, Labeaga-Azcona JM, Vilaplana-Prieto C. Interactions between private health and long-term care insurance and the effects of the crisis: evidence for Spain. Health Econ. 2016;25(S2):159-179. doi:1002/hec.3440
  8. Costa-Font J, Courbage C, Swartz K. Financing long-term care: ex ante, ex post or both? Health Econ. 2015;24 Suppl 1:45-57. doi:1002/hec.3152
  9. European Parliament resolution of 19 January 2017 on a European Pillar of Social Rights (2016/2095(INI)). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/social-summit-european-pillar-social-rights-booklet_en.pdf.
  10. Bolin K, Lindgren B, Lundborg P. Your next of kin or your own career? caring and working among the 50+ of Europe. J Health Econ. 2008;27(3):718-738. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2007.10.004
  11. Kraus M, Riedel M, Mot E, Willemé P, Röhrling G, Czypionka T. A Typology of Long-Term Care Systems in Europe. ENEPRI Research Report No. 91/August 2010. Available at: http://ennhri.org/news-and-blog/overview-long-term-care-in-europe/.
  12. Da Roit B, Le Bihan B. Cash for long-term care: policy debates, visions, and designs on the move. Soc Policy Adm. 2019;53(4):519-536. doi:1111/spol.12506
  13. Österle A. Long-term care in Central and South-Eastern Europe: challenges and perspectives in addressing a ‘new’ social risk. Soc Policy Adm. 2010;44(4):461-480. doi:1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00723.x
  14. Fenger HJ. Welfare regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences. 2007;3(2):1-30.
  15. Damiani G, Farelli V, Anselmi A, et al. Patterns of long term care in 29 European countries: evidence from an exploratory study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:316. doi:1186/1472-6963-11-316
  16. Křížová E, Janečková H, Běláček J. Family carers’ perspectives on integrated community care in the Czech Republic. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016;24(4):289-296. doi:21101/cejph.a4463
  17. Spasova S, Baeten R, Coster S, Ghailani D, Peña-Casas R, Vanhercke B. Challenges in Long-Term Care in Europe: A Study of National Policies 2018. Brussels: European Commission; 2018.
  18. European Commission. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. The 2018 Ageing Report. Economic & Budgetary Projections for the 28 EU Member States (2016-2070). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/ip079_en.pdf.
  19. Daatland SO, Herlofson K. ‘Lost solidarity’ or ‘changed solidarity’: a comparative European view of normative family solidarity. Ageing Soc. 2003;23(5):537-560. doi:1017/s0144686x03001272
  20. Kikuzawa S, Olafsdottir S, Pescosolido BA. Similar pressures, different contexts: public attitudes toward government intervention for health care in 21 nations. J Health Soc Behav. 2008;49(4):385-399. doi:1177/002214650804900402
  21. Leitner S. Varieties of familialism: developing care policies in conservative welfare states. In: Sandermann P, ed. The End of Welfare as We Know it? Continuity and Change in Western Welfare State Settings and Practices. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich; 2014.
  22. van den Berg B, Brouwer WB, Koopmanschap MA. Economic valuation of informal care. An overview of methods and applications. Eur J Health Econ. 2004;5(1):36-45. doi:1007/s10198-003-0189-y
  23. Triantafillou J, Naiditch M, Repkova K, et al. Informal care in the long-term care system: European Overview Paper. Interlinks. 2010;223037:1-67.
  24. Courtin E, Jemiai N, Mossialos E. Mapping support policies for informal carers across the European Union. Health Policy. 2014;118(1):84-94. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.013
  25. Bremer P, Cabrera E, Leino-Kilpi H, et al. Informal dementia care: consequences for caregivers' health and health care use in 8 European countries. Health Policy. 2015;119(11):1459-1471. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2015.09.014
  26. Kaschowitz J, Brandt M. Health effects of informal caregiving across Europe: a longitudinal approach. Soc Sci Med. 2017;173:72-80. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.036
  27. Le Bihan B, Da Roit B, Sopadzhiyan A. The turn to optional familialism through the market: long-term care, cash-for-care, and caregiving policies in Europe. Soc Policy Adm. 2019;53(4):579-595. doi:1111/spol.12505
  28. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Princeton University Press; 1990.
  29. Leitner S. Varieties of familialism: the caring function of the family in comparative perspective. Eur Soc. 2003;5(4):353-375. doi:1080/1461669032000127642
  30. Saraceno C. Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency: a bi-generational perspective. J Eur Soc Policy. 2010;20(1):32-44. doi:1177/0958928709352540
  31. Saraceno C. Varieties of familialism: comparing four southern European and East Asian welfare regimes. J Eur Soc Policy. 2016;26(4):314-326. doi:1177/0958928716657275
  32. Bartha A, Zentai V. Long-term care and gender equality: fuzzy-set ideal types of care regimes in Europe. Soc Incl. 2020;8(4):92-102. doi:17645/si.v8i4.2956
  33. Pickard L. A growing care gap? the supply of unpaid care for older people by their adult children in England to 2032. Ageing Soc. 2015;35(1):96-123. doi:1017/s0144686x13000512
  34. Comas-Herrera A, Wittenberg R, Costa-Font J, et al. Future long-term care expenditure in Germany, Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom. Ageing Soc. 2006;26(2):285-302. doi:1017/s0144686x05004289
  35. Zigante V. Informal Care in Europe. Exploring Formalisation, Availability and Quality. European Commission; 2018:4-38.
  36. Geerts J, Willemé P. Projections of Use and Supply of Long-Term Care in Europe: Policy Implications. ENEPRI Policy Brief. No. 12. 2012.
  37. Yoo BK, Bhattacharya J, McDonald KM, Garber AM. Impacts of informal caregiver availability on long-term care expenditures in OECD countries. Health Serv Res. 2004;39(6 Pt 2):1971-1992. doi:1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00328.x
  38. Agree EM, Glaser K. Demography of informal caregiving. In: Uhlenberg P, ed. International Handbook of Population Aging. New York: Springer; 2009:647-668.
  39. Colombo F, Llena-Nozal A, Mercier J, Tiadens F. Help wanted? Providing and Paying Need for Long-Term Care. Paris: OECD; 2011.
  40. Broese van Groenou MI, De Boer A. Providing informal care in a changing society. Eur J Ageing. 2016;13(3):271-279. doi:1007/s10433-016-0370-7
  41. Campbell JC, Ikegami N, Gibson MJ. Lessons from public long-term care insurance in Germany and Japan. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(1):87-95. doi:1377/hlthaff.2009.0548
  42. Del Pozo-Rubio R, Moya-Martínez P, Ortega-Ortega M, Oliva-Moreno J. Shadow and extended shadow cost sharing associated to informal long-term care: the case of Spain. Health Econ Rev. 2020;10(1):12. doi:1186/s13561-020-00272-1
  43. Wija P. Formal and informal long-term care and the role of family carers: Czech Republic. Eur J Ment Health. 2015;10(2):233-244. doi:5708/ejmh.10.2015.2.9
  44. Mosca I, van der Wees PJ, Mot ES, Wammes JJG, Jeurissen PPT. Sustainability of long-term care: puzzling tasks ahead for policy-makers. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(4):195-205. doi:15171/ijhpm.2016.109
  45. Luengo-Fernandez R, Violato M, Candio P, Leal J. Economic burden of stroke across Europe: a population-based cost analysis. Eur Stroke J. 2020;5(1):17-25. doi:1177/2396987319883160
  46. Peña-Longobardo LM, Aranda-Reneo I, Oliva-Moreno J, et al. The economic impact and health-related quality of life of spinal muscular atrophy. An analysis across Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(16):5640. doi:3390/ijerph17165640
  47. Coumoundouros C, Ould Brahim L, Lambert SD, McCusker J. The direct and indirect financial costs of informal cancer care: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27(5):e622-e636. doi:1111/hsc.12808
  48. Oliva-Moreno J, Trapero-Bertran M, Peña-Longobardo LM, Del Pozo-Rubio R. The valuation of informal care in cost-of-illness studies: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(3):331-345. doi:1007/s40273-016-0468-y
  49. Hanly P, Sheerin C. Valuing informal care in Ireland: beyond the traditional production boundary. Econ Soc Rev. 2017;48(3):337-364.
  50. Oliva-Moreno J, Peña-Longobardo LM, García-Mochón L, Del Río Lozano M, Mosquera Metcalfe I, García-Calvente MDM. The economic value of time of informal care and its determinants (The CUIDARSE Study). PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217016. doi:1371/journal.pone.0217016
  51. Barczyk D, Kredler M. Long-term care across Europe and the United States: the role of informal and formal care. Fisc Stud. 2019;40(3):329-373. doi:1111/1475-5890.12200
  52. Hoefman RJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. How to include informal care in economic evaluations. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1105-1119. doi:1007/s40273-013-0104-z
  53. Koopmanschap MA, van Exel JN, van den Berg B, Brouwer WB. An overview of methods and applications to value informal care in economic evaluations of healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(4):269-280. doi:2165/00019053-200826040-00001
  54. Viitanen TK. Informal Elderly Care and Women’s Labour Force Participation across Europe. European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes No. 13. July 2005.
  55. Saltman RB, Dubois HF, Chawla M. The impact of aging on long-term care in Europe and some potential policy responses. Int J Health Serv. 2006;36(4):719-746. doi:2190/aul1-4lam-4vnb-3yh0
  56. Mair CA, Quiñones AR, Pasha MA. Care preferences among middle-aged and older adults with chronic disease in Europe: individual health care needs and national health care infrastructure. Gerontologist. 2016;56(4):687-701. doi:1093/geront/gnu119
  57. Litwin H, Stoeckel KJ, Roll A. Relationship status and depressive symptoms among older co-resident caregivers. Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(2):225-231. doi:1080/13607863.2013.837148
  58. Verbakel E. How to understand informal caregiving patterns in Europe? the role of formal long-term care provisions and family care norms. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(4):436-447. doi:1177/1403494817726197
  59. International Long Term Care Policy Netwok. Country reports: COVID-19 and Long-Term Care. https://ltccovid.org/country-reports-on-covid-19-and-long-term-care/. Accessed July 15, 2020.
  60. Warner E, Sutton E, Andrews F. Cohousing as a model for social health: a scoping review. Cities Health. 2020:1-13. doi:1080/23748834.2020.1838225
  61. Rusinovic K, Bochove MV, Sande JV. Senior co-housing in the Netherlands: benefits and drawbacks for its residents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3776. doi:3390/ijerph16193776
  62. Beck AF. What is co-housing? developing a conceptual framework from the studies of Danish intergenerational co-housing. Hous Theory Soc. 2020;37(1):40-64. doi:1080/14036096.2019.1633398
  63. Angioni M, Musso F. New perspectives from technology adoption in senior cohousing facilities. TQM J. 2020;32(4):761-777. doi:1108/tqm-10-2019-0250
  64. Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Rouncefield M. What is quality in assisted living technology? the ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Med. 2015;13:91. doi:1186/s12916-015-0279-6
  65. Laperche B, Boutillier S, Djellal F, et al. Innovating for elderly people: the development of geront’innovations in the French silver economy. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2019;31(4):462-476. doi:1080/09537325.2018.1520975
  66. García-Peñalvo FJ, Franco-Martín M. Sensor technologies for caring people with disabilities. Sensors. 2019;19(22):4914. doi:3390/s19224914
  67. Changizi M, Kaveh MH. Effectiveness of the mHealth technology in improvement of healthy behaviors in an elderly population-a systematic review. Mhealth. 2017;3:51. doi:21037/mhealth.2017.08.06
  68. Torp S, Hanson E, Hauge S, Ulstein I, Magnusson L. A pilot study of how information and communication technology may contribute to health promotion among elderly spousal carers in Norway. Health Soc Care Community. 2008;16(1):75-85. doi:1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00725.x
  69. Fejes A, Nicoll K. A vocational calling: exploring a caring technology in elderly care. Pedagog Cult Soc. 2010;18(3):353-370. doi:1080/14681366.2010.504646
  70. Robinson L, Gibson G, Kingston A, et al. Assistive technologies in caring for the oldest old: a review of current practice and future directions. Aging Health. 2013;9(4):365-375. doi:2217/ahe.13.35
  71. Bolin K, Lindgren B, Lundborg P. Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe. Health Econ. 2008;17(3):393-409. doi:1002/hec.1275
  72. Bonsang E. Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? J Health Econ. 2009;28(1):143-154. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.002
  73. Balia S, Brau R. A country for old men? long-term home care utilization in Europe. Health Econ. 2014;23(10):1185-1212. doi:1002/hec.2977
  74. Van Houtven CH, Coe NB, Skira MM. The effect of informal care on work and wages. J Health Econ. 2013;32(1):240-252. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.006
  75. Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA. 1999;282(23):2215-2219. doi:1001/jama.282.23.2215
  76. Bauer JM, Sousa-Poza A. Impacts of informal caregiving on caregiver employment, health, and family. J Popul Ageing. 2015;8(3):113-145. doi:1007/s12062-015-9116-0
  77. Cooper C, Balamurali TB, Livingston G. A systematic review of the prevalence and covariates of anxiety in caregivers of people with dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2007;19(2):175-195. doi:1017/s1041610206004297
  78. Heitmueller A, Inglis K. The earnings of informal carers: wage differentials and opportunity costs. J Health Econ. 2007;26(4):821-841. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.009

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 30 October 2021
  • Receive Date: 16 September 2020
  • Revise Date: 24 September 2021
  • Accept Date: 27 October 2021
  • First Publish Date: 30 October 2021