Is It Possible to Solve the Conflicts Over Conflict of Interest?; Comment on “Towards Preventing and Managing Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy? An Analysis of Submissions to a Consultation on a Draft WHO Tool”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

Abstract

Addressing conflicts of interest (COIs) when developing and implementing policies to address commercial determinants of health is pivotal to ensure that these policies are free from commercial and other vested interests of unhealthy commodities industry. As a concept, this is well accepted within the tobacco control community, and supported by the existence of an international treaty, the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). But in nutrition policy the engagement of the food industry appears to remain controversial, as efforts to create partnerships are still underway. There is a need to undertake evaluation of existing COI policies to assess their implementation and outcomes, creating best practice models that can be replicated, and understanding how to change norms within governments. Additionally, a review of existing norms, codes of conduct, and ethics to determine their impact on preventing COI would guide future implementation of these measures. Finally, governments, academics, and advocates should consider how existing tools, guidelines or other instruments could help frame the COI discussion to ensure its political feasibility. There is a need for a discussion on whether the current approach of separate policies for distinct industries is preferable than a broader COI policy that would be applicable to a wide range of unhealthy commodities and across governmental sectors.

Keywords

References

  1.  Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
    Ralston R, Hil SE, da Silva Gomes F, Collin J. Towards preventing and managing conflict of interest in nutrition policy? an analysis of submissions to a consultation on a draft WHO tool. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10(5):255-265. doi:34172/ijhpm.2020.52
  2. World Health Organization. Framework for Engagement with Non-state Actors. WHO. https://www.who.int/about/collaborations/non-state-actors/A69_R10-FENSA-en.pdf.
  3. Ruckert A, Labonté R. Public–private partnerships (ppps) in global health: the good, the bad and the ugly. Third World Q. 2014;35(9):1598-1614. doi:1080/01436597.2014.970870
  4. Hernandez-Aguado I, Zaragoza GA. Support of public-private partnerships in health promotion and conflicts of interest. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e009342. doi:1136/bmjopen-2015-009342
  5. Collin J. Taking steps toward coherent global governance of alcohol: the challenge and opportunity of managing conflict of interest. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2021;82(3):387-394.
  6. Swinburn BA, Kraak VI, Allender S, et al. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet. 2019;393(10173):791-846. doi:1016/s0140-6736(18)32822-8
  7. Collin J, Ralston R, Hill S, Westerman L. Signalling Virtue, Promoting Harm: Unhealthy commodity industries and COVID-19. 2020. https://ncdalliance.org/sites/default/files/resource_files/Signalling%20Virtue%2C%20Promoting%20Harm_Sept2020_FINALv.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2021.
  8. Conference of the Parties (COP) of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Guidelines on the protection of public health policies with respect to tobacco control from commercial and other vested interests. (COP Decision FCTC/COP3(7). https://www.who.int/fctc/guidelines/article_5_3.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2018. Published November 2008.
  9. Bialous SA. Impact of implementation of the WHO FCTC on the tobacco industry's behaviour. Tob Control. 2019;28(Suppl 2):s94-s96. doi:1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054808
  10. Mialon M, Vandevijvere S, Carriedo-Lutzenkirchen A, et al. Mechanisms for addressing and managing the influence of corporations on public health policy, research and practice: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e034082. doi:1136/bmjopen-2019-034082
  11. The Convention Secretariat. Global progress in implementation of the WHO FCTC. 2021. Ninth session of the Conference of the Parties. https://untobaccocontrol.org/downloads/cop9/main-documents/FCTC_COP_9_5_EN.pdf. Accessed June 16, 2021.
  12. The Convention Secretariat. Examples of implementation of Article 5.3 communicated through the reports of the Parties. https://www.who.int/fctc/parties_experiences/en/.
  13. Hawkins B, Holden C. European Union implementation of Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Global Health. 2018;14(1):79. doi:1186/s12992-018-0386-1
  14. United Nations Human Rights. Office of the High Commission. Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights. 2011. https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf. Accessed June 14, 2021.
  15. United Nations Global Compact. Guidelines on a principle-based approach to the Cooperation between the United Nations and the business sector. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/3431. Accessed June 14, 2021.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 11, Issue 3
March 2022
Pages 398-400

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 20 July 2021
  • Revise Date: 25 December 2021
  • Accept Date: 26 December 2021
  • First Publish Date: 27 December 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics