Legitimacy of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels: Controversy Over the Deployment of the Nutri-Score in Italy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Nutritional Epidemiology Research Team (EREN), Epidemiology and Statistics Research Center, Sorbonne Paris Nord University, Villetaneuse, France

2 Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité (CRESS), University of Paris, Paris, France

3 Centre de Recherche Réseaux, Innovation, Territoire et Mondialisation (RITM), Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

4 Public Health Department, Avicenne Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Bobigny, France

Abstract

Background 
Front-of-Pack nutrition Labels (FoPLs) aim at increasing transparency and consumers’ awareness of the nutritional composition of pre-packed food products in order to improve the nutritional quality of their food choices. Nevertheless, the legitimacy of the Nutri-Score - the FoPL officially adopted in France and several other European countries - is subject to both technical and political controversy, particularly in Italy. In this study, we investigated how and by whom the legitimacy of the Nutri-Score, recognized by several institutional authorities, could be deconstructed within a specific system of norms, values and beliefs among Italian stakeholders.

Methods 

A netnography completed with qualitative interviews with eight Italian and French nutrition and public health experts were carried out to highlight the dimensions (pragmatic, normative and cognitive) in which the Nutri-Score’s legitimacy is being challenged among the stakeholders involved in FoPLs’ implementation in Italy. The degree of influence and the position of these stakeholders on the debate around the Nutri-Score were assessed through the Stakeholder Theory, using their respective level of power, legitimacy and urgency. Furthermore, we compared the Italian and the French contexts on the issue.

Results 
The direct implication of political parties and media outlets in framing the Italian debate around Nutri-Score as well as the high influence of corporate unions, led to a different political outcome than in France. Results also show that the deconstruction of the legitimacy of the Nutri-Score in Italy pertained mainly to its pragmatic dimension according to the Italian public health experts. Nevertheless, its two other dimensions (normative and cognitive) are also questioned by high-influence stakeholders.

Conclusion 
Due to the limited mobilization of scientific expertise over the issue, the debate in Italy stayed centered around the “attack” of the Nutri-Score to the Italian way of life, mixing up concepts such as Made in Italy products and the Mediterranean Diet.

Keywords


  1. WHO. Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Geneva, Switzerland; 2004:18. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241592222.
  2. WHO Europe. Manual to Develop and Implement Frontofpack Nutrition Labelling: Guidance for Countries on the Selection and Testing of Evidenceinformed Frontofpack Nutrition Labelling Systems in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2020:23. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/336988. Accessed December 17, 2020.
  3. European Commission. A Farm to Fork Strategy: For a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. Communication on the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Council and the Commitee of the Regions.; 2020. http://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/ea0f9f73-9ab2-11ea-9d2d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed June 26, 2020.
  4. Label: Food & drink labelling > Reference Intakes. http://www.foodlabel.org.uk/label/reference-intakes.aspx. Accessed September 23, 2021.
  5. Asp NG, Bryngelsson S. Health claims in the labelling and marketing of food products: Scandinavian Journal of Food and Nutrition. 2007;51(3):107-126. doi:10.1080/17482970701652203
  6. Santé Publique France. Nutri-Score. /determinants-de-sante/nutrition-et-activite-physique/articles/nutri-score. Published December 11, 2020. Accessed December 14, 2020.
  7. European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling Schemes: A Comprehensive Review. LU: Publications Office; 2020. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/436998. Accessed September 27, 2021.
  8. Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé. Articles scientifiques et documents publiés relatifs au Nutri-Score. Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé. https://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/prevention-en-sante/preserver-sa-sante/nutrition/article/articles-scientifiques-et-documents-publies-relatifs-au-nutri-score. Published November 30, 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020.
  9. Egnell M, Talati Z, Galan P, et al. Objective understanding of the Nutri-score front-of-pack label by European consumers and its effect on food choices: an online experimental study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2020;17(1):146. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01053-z
  10. Egnell M, Talati Z, Hercberg S, Pettigrew S, Julia C. Objective understanding of front-of-package nutrition labels: An international comparative experimental study across 12 countries. Nutrients. 2018;10(10):1542.
  11. foodnavigator.com. Does Nutri-Score discriminate against traditional foods? foodnavigator.com. https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2020/12/11/Does-Nutri-Score-discriminate-against-traditional-foods. Published December 11, 2020. Accessed December 15, 2020.
  12. Pira RL. La guerra delle etichette: Bellanova e Speranza contrari al Nutri-Score! Ma non servono autorizzazioni e il semaforo avanza in Europa. Il Fatto Alimentare. https://ilfattoalimentare.it/nutri-score-etichetta-semaforo-bellanova.html. Accessed September 14, 2021.
  13. Ambassador G. L. Cornado,. WHO - Press release on the draft document “WHO guiding principles and framework manual for front-of-pack labelling for promoting healthy diets.” https://italiarappginevra.esteri.it/rappginevra/en/ambasciata/news/dall-ambasciata/2019/05/oms-comunicato-stampa-sul-documento.html. Published June 5, 2019. Accessed December 14, 2020.
  14. NutrInform Battery. Nutrinform Battery. https://www.nutrinformbattery.it/. Published 2020. Accessed December 14, 2020.
  15. Follis A. Sept pays de l’UE s’opposent au système d’étiquetage des aliments Nutri-Score. www.euractiv.fr. September 2020. https://www.euractiv.fr/section/alimentation/news/sept-pays-de-lue-sopposent-au-systeme-detiquetage-des-aliments-nutri-score/. Accessed December 14, 2020.
  16. Front of Pack Nutrition Labeling Information from the Italian and the Czech delegations, on behalf of the Cyprus, Czech, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Latvian and Romanian delegations. European Council. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/public-register/public-register-search/results/. Published September 17, 2020. Accessed November 23, 2021.
  17. Mercier S, Gond JP. Les théories des parties prenantes: une synthèse critique de la littérature. AGRH (Université du Québec à Montréal). 2004.
  18. Sturdivant FD. Executives and activists: Test of stakeholder management. California Management Review. 1979;22(1):53-59.
  19. Scholl HJ. Applying stakeholder theory to e-government. In: Towards the E-Society. Springer; 2001:735-747.
  20. Roux D, Chevalier C, Nabec L. Les parties prenantes consuméristes et l’impact de leur dynamique collective pour les entreprises. Décisions Marketing. 2015;(77).
  21. Varvasovszky Z, Mckee M. An analysis of alcohol policy in Hungary. Who is in charge? Addiction. 1998;93(12):1815-1827.
  22. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review. 1997;22(4):853-886.
  23. Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning. 2000;15(3):338-345. doi:10.1093/heapol/15.3.338
  24. Suchman MC. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review. 1995;20(3):571-610.
  25. Lichtlé MC, Nabec L, Roux D, Chevalier C. Légitimité des associations de consommateurs et vulnérabilité perçue de leurs publics : quels effets sur l’intention de confiance envers les acteurs consuméristes ? Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition). 2018;33(1):56-77. doi:10.1177/0767370117738706
  26. Nabec L, Chevalier C, Briat E, Roux D. Légitimité et stratégies de légitimation des associations de consommateurs dans le paysage consumériste actuel. Décisions Marketing. 2015;78:63-77.
  27. BEUC. Cross-sector call for Nutri-Score on all foods in EU. www.beuc.eu. https://www.beuc.eu/press-media/news-events/cross-sector-call-nutri-score-all-foods-eu. Published April 28, 2020. Accessed December 18, 2020.
  28. Google Trends. Google Trends. Google Trends. https://trends.google.fr/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&geo=IT&q=%2Fg%2F11f03mrg_c. Published 2020. Accessed December 16, 2020.
  29. Nestlé va finalement adopter le Nutri-Score au niveau européen. www.euractiv.fr. June 2019. https://www.euractiv.fr/section/soci-t/news/nestle-va-finalement-adopter-le-nutri-score-au-niveau-europeen/. Accessed September 9, 2021.
  30. L’Italia verso l’etichetta a batteria. Un nuovo logo dirà quanto ci stiamo “ricaricando.” la Repubblica. https://www.repubblica.it/economia/diritti-e-consumi/diritti-consumatori/2020/01/29/news/l_italia_verso_l_etichetta_a_batteria_un_nuovo_logo_con_i_nutrienti_dei_cibi-246605082/. Published January 30, 2020. Accessed September 16, 2021.
  31. nasce-filiera-italia-alleanza-agricoltura-industria. Coldiretti. https://www.coldiretti.it/economia/nasce-filiera-italia-alleanza-agricoltura-industria. Published October 21, 2017. Accessed September 24, 2021.
  32. Redazione Alimenta. Solid trust in the food&beverage industry in Italy, but decreasing in several countries. Alimenta Srl. October 2015. http://alimentasrl.com/650/solid-trust-foodbeverage-industry-italy-decreasing-several-countries.html. Accessed December 14, 2020.
  33. “Traffic light” labelling. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-8-2016-002170_EN.html. Accessed September 22, 2021.
  34. foodnavigator.com. Italy raises red flag once more over UK’s traffic light label. foodnavigator.com. https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2016/03/16/Italy-raises-red-flag-once-more-over-UK-s-traffic-light-label. Accessed September 22, 2021.
  35. Mise. Made in Italy: notificato alla Commissione Ue il sistema di etichettatura ‘NutrInform Battery.’ Mise. https://www.mise.gov.it/index.php/it/198-notizie-stampa/2040704-made-in-italy-notificato-alla-commissione-ue-il-sistema-di-etichettatura-nutrinform-battery. Published January 27, 2020. Accessed December 16, 2020.
  36. Nutriscore, il medico Walter Ricciardi: “Mi baso sull’evidenza scientifica, ci sono studi che dimostrano che questa etichetta alimentare è uno strumento efficace.” https://www.la7.it/laria-che-tira/video/nutriscore-il-medico-walter-ricciardi-mi-baso-sullevidenza-scientifica-ci-sono-studi-che-dimostrano-31-01-2020-305138. Accessed September 20, 2021.
  37. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. Il diabete in Italia. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/202600. Published July 28, 2017. Accessed December 14, 2020.
  38. Santé Publique France. Prévalence et incidence du diabète. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/diabete/articles/prevalence-et-incidence-du-diabete. Published November 14, 2019. Accessed December 14, 2020.
  39. Italy Formally Adopts Nutrinform Labeling System. Olive Oil Times. https://www.oliveoiltimes.com/business/europe/italy-formally-adopts-nutrinform-labeling-system/86882. Published October 30, 2020. Accessed September 23, 2021.
  40. Willett WC, Sacks F, Trichopoulou A, et al. Mediterranean diet pyramid: a cultural model for healthy eating. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1995;61(6):1402S-1406S. doi:10.1093/ajcn/61.6.1402S
  41. Mipaaf. Mipaaf - NutrInform Battery: Firmato il decreto che introduce il logo del modello di etichettatura volontaria italiana. Bellanova: “Poniamo al centro il consumatore e i principi della dieta Mediterranea”. https://www.politicheagricole.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/16147. Published October 27, 2020. Accessed December 14, 2020.
  42. Crosetto P, Muller L, Ruffieux B. Réponses des consommateurs à trois systèmes d’étiquetage nutritionnel face avant. Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique. 2016;51(3):124-131.
  43. Dubois P, Albuquerque P, Allais O, et al. Effects of front-of-pack labels on the nutritional quality of supermarket food purchases: evidence from a large-scale randomized controlled trial. J of the Acad Mark Sci. April 2020. doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00723-5
  44. Feteira-Santos R, Alarcão V, Santos O, et al. Looking Ahead: Health Impact Assessment of Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labelling Schema as a Public Health Measure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(4):1422. doi:10.3390/ijerph18041422
  45. Mazzù MF, Romani S, Gambicorti A. Effects on consumers’ subjective understanding of a new front-of-pack nutritional label: a study on Italian consumers. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. August 2020:1-10. doi:10.1080/09637486.2020.1796932
  46. Mazzù MF, Romani S, Baccelloni A, Gambicorti A. A cross-country experimental study on consumers’ subjective understanding and liking on front-of-pack nutrition labels. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2021;72(6):833-847. doi:10.1080/09637486.2021.1873918
  47. León-Muñoz LM, Guallar-Castillón P, Graciani A, et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Pattern Has Declined in Spanish Adults. J Nutr. 2012;142(10):1843-1850. doi:10.3945/jn.112.164616
  48. Bonaccio M, Di Castelnuovo A, Bonanni A, et al. Socioeconomic status and impact of the economic crisis on dietary habits in Italy: results from the INHES study. J Public Health (Oxf). 2018;40(4):703-712. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdx144
  49. Grosso G, Marventano S, Giorgianni G, Raciti T, Galvano F, Mistretta A. Mediterranean diet adherence rates in Sicily, southern Italy. Public health nutrition. 2013;17:1-9. doi:10.1017/S1368980013002188
  50. Veronese N, Notarnicola M, Cisternino AM, et al. Trends in adherence to the Mediterranean diet in South Italy: A cross sectional study. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. 2020;30(3):410-417. doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2019.11.003
  51. WHO. Latest data shows southern European countries have highest rate of childhood obesity. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/news/news/2018/5/latest-data-shows-southern-european-countries-have-highest-rate-of-childhood-obesity. Published May 24, 2018. Accessed December 1, 2020.
  52. Istat. Rapporto annuale 2016 – La situazione del Paese. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/185497. Published May 20, 2016. Accessed December 1, 2020.
  53. Antúnez L, Giménez A, Maiche A, Ares G. Influence of Interpretation Aids on Attentional Capture, Visual Processing, and Understanding of Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47(4):292-299.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2015.02.010
  54. Bialkova S, Grunert KG, Juhl HJ, Wasowicz-Kirylo G, Stysko-Kunkowska M, van Trijp HCM. Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers’ choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking. Appetite. 2014;76:66-75. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.021
  55. Fialon M, Egnell M, Talati Z, et al. Effectiveness of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels among Italian Consumers: Results from an Online Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2307. doi:10.3390/nu12082307

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 15 January 2022
  • Receive Date: 11 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 11 January 2022
  • Accept Date: 12 January 2022