Acknowledge the Elephant in the Room: The Role of Power Dynamics in Transforming Food Systems; Comment on “What Opportunities Exist for Making the Food Supply Nutrition Friendly? A Policy Space Analysis in Mexico”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

1 Department of Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK

2 World Public Health Nutrition Association, Peacehaven, UK

3 Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

4 College of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

Abstract

A paradigm shift is required to transform food systems, so they are more equitable, environmentally friendly, and healthy. This requires acknowledging which factors change or maintain the status quo. In this commentary, we reflect upon the Cervantes et al study findings and discuss the role of power dynamics in transforming food systems. This is directly relevant to Mexico in terms of (i) relationships between food system actors; (ii) the role of socio-economic political context; and (iii) opportunities for policy coherence and transformative food systems approaches. We suggest that the power dynamics that drive the food produced, sold, and consumed should be recognised in all (inter)national governance decision-making. The 2021 United Nations Food System Summit – when interest groups were perceived to overly influence the summit proceedings – is an example of how neglecting the role of power dynamics can undermine and slow food system transformation.

Keywords


  1. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). 2021 Global Food Policy Report: Transforming Food Systems after COVID-19. Washington, DC, USA: IFPRI; 2021. doi:2499/9780896293991
  2. Brown KA, Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy N, Law C, et al. Moving towards sustainable food systems: a review of Indian food policy budgets. Glob Food Sec. 2021;28:100462. doi:1016/j.gfs.2020.100462
  3. UN Economic and Social Council. High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development. Annual Secretary General SDG Report 2021. 2021. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2021/secretary-general-sdg-report-2021--Statistical-Annex.pdf.
  4. Popkin BM, Hawkes C. Sweetening of the global diet, particularly beverages: patterns, trends, and policy responses. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(2):174-186. doi:1016/s2213-8587(15)00419-2
  5. Crosbie E, Carriedo A, Schmidt L. Hollow threats: transnational food and beverage companies' use of international agreements to fight front-of-pack nutrition labeling in Mexico and beyond. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(6):722-725. doi:34172/ijhpm.2020.146
  6. Carriedo A, Lock K, Hawkins B. Policy process and non-state actors' influence on the 2014 Mexican soda tax. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(8):941-952. doi:1093/heapol/czaa060
  7. Lauber K, Ralston R, Mialon M, Carriedo A, Gilmore AB. Non-communicable disease governance in the era of the sustainable development goals: a qualitative analysis of food industry framing in WHO consultations. Global Health. 2020;16(1):76. doi:1186/s12992-020-00611-1
  8. Lauber K, Rutter H, Gilmore AB. Big food and the World Health Organization: a qualitative study of industry attempts to influence global-level non-communicable disease policy. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):e005216. doi:1136/bmjgh-2021-005216
  9. Alianza por la Salud Alimentaria. Quiénes Somos. Alianza por la Salud Alimentaria; 2012. http://alianzasalud.org.mx/quienes-somos/. Accessed February 21, 2016.
  10. Harwood J. Peasant friendly plant breeding and the early years of the green revolution in Mexico. Agric Hist. 2009;83(3):384-410. doi:3098/ah.2009.83.3.384
  11. Milsom P, Smith R, Baker P, Walls H. International investment liberalization, transnational corporations and NCD prevention policy non-decisions: a realist review on the political economy of tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food. Global Health. 2021;17(1):134. doi:1186/s12992-021-00784-3
  12. Shamah-Levy T, Cuevas-Nasu L, Romero-Martínez M, Gómez-Humaran IM, Ávila-Arcos MA, Rivera JA. Nutrition status of children, teenagers, and adults from National Health and Nutrition Surveys in Mexico from 2006 to 2020. Front Nutr. 2021;8:777246. doi:3389/fnut.2021.777246
  13. Bonvecchio Arenas A, González W, Théodore FL, et al. Translating evidence-based program recommendations into action: the design, testing, and scaling up of the behavior change strategy EsIAN in Mexico. J Nutr. 2019;149(Suppl 1):2310S-2322S. doi:1093/jn/nxz229
  14. Gobierno de México. Impulsa Gobierno de México un sistema agroalimentario justo, saludable, sustentable y competitivo. https://www.gob.mx/pa/articulos/impulsa-gobierno-de-mexico-un-sistema-agroalimentario-justo-saludable-sustentable-y-competitivo. Published January 22, 2021.
  15.  WCRFI. NOURISHING Policy Database. 2019. http://www.wcrf.org/NOURISHING.

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 12 July 2022
  • Receive Date: 11 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 06 July 2022
  • Accept Date: 11 July 2022
  • First Publish Date: 12 July 2022