Policies for Social and Health Equity: The Case for Equity Sensitive Universalism; Comment on “Implementing Universal and Targeted Policies for Health Equity: Lessons From Australia”
This commentary reflects on an important article by Fisher and colleagues who draw on four Australian policy case studies to examine how universal and targeted approaches or a combination can be deployed to improve health equity. They conclude that universal approaches are central to action to increase health equity, but that targeting can improve equity of access in some situations including in the context of proportionate universalism. However, we argue that although target services may provide benefits for some populations, they are often stigmatizing and fail to reach may people they aim to support. Instead of accepting the dominant discourse about the key role for targeted approaches, we argue that those committed to reduce social and health inequities should consider the potential of Equity Sensitive Universalism (ESU). This approach focuses on achieving proportionate outcomes with equally provided resources rather than proportionate inputs and provides a ‘cohesion dividend,’ increasing social solidarity.
Bambra C. Levelling up: global examples of reducing health inequalities. Scand J Public Health. 2022;50(7):908-913. doi:1177/14034948211022428
Singer M. Introduction to Syndemics: A Critical Systems Approach to Public and Community Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
Fisher M, Harris P, Freeman T, et al. Implementing universal and targeted policies for health equity: lessons from Australia. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.157
Sen A. Development: which way now? Econ J. 1983;93(372):745-762. doi:2307/2232744
Titmuss RM. Commitment to Welfare. 2nd ed. George Allen and Unwin Ltd; 1968.
Gronholm PC, Nye E, Michelson D. Stigma related to targeted school-based mental health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. J Affect Disord. 2018;240:17-26. doi:1016/j.jad.2018.07.023
Lapham J, Martinson ML. The intersection of welfare stigma, state contexts and health among mothers receiving public assistance benefits. SSM Popul Health. 2022;18:101117. doi:1016/j.ssmph.2022.101117
Mead R, Thurston M, Bloyce D. From public issues to personal troubles: individualising social inequalities in health within local public health partnerships. Crit Public Health. 2022;32(2):168-180. doi:1080/09581596.2020.1763916
Popay J, Halliday E, Mead R, et al. Communities in Control: A mixed method evaluation of the Big Local community empowerment initiative in England. NIHR Public Health Research; forthcoming.
Akhter N, McGowan VJ, Halliday E, Popay J, Kasim A, Bambra C. Community empowerment and mental wellbeing: longitudinal findings from a survey of people actively involved in the big local place-based initiative in England. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022. doi:1093/pubmed/fdac073
Marmot M. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review. London: Institute of Health Equity; 2010.
Merlo J, Wagner P, Leckie G. A simple multilevel approach for analysing geographical inequalities in public health reports: the case of municipality differences in obesity. Health Place. 2019;58:102145. doi:1016/j.healthplace.2019.102145
Coote A, Percy A. The Case for Universal Basic Services. Cambridge: Polity; 2020.
Mead, R., Pickin, C., & Popay, J. (2022). Policies for Social and Health Equity: The Case for Equity Sensitive Universalism; Comment on “Implementing Universal and Targeted Policies for Health Equity: Lessons From Australia”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(12), 3151-3154. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7573
MLA
Rebecca Mead; Chrissie Pickin; Jennie Popay. "Policies for Social and Health Equity: The Case for Equity Sensitive Universalism; Comment on “Implementing Universal and Targeted Policies for Health Equity: Lessons From Australia”". International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11, 12, 2022, 3151-3154. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7573
HARVARD
Mead, R., Pickin, C., Popay, J. (2022). 'Policies for Social and Health Equity: The Case for Equity Sensitive Universalism; Comment on “Implementing Universal and Targeted Policies for Health Equity: Lessons From Australia”', International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(12), pp. 3151-3154. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7573
VANCOUVER
Mead, R., Pickin, C., Popay, J. Policies for Social and Health Equity: The Case for Equity Sensitive Universalism; Comment on “Implementing Universal and Targeted Policies for Health Equity: Lessons From Australia”. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2022; 11(12): 3151-3154. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7573