A Realist Explanatory Case Study Investigating How Common Goals, Leadership, and Committed Staff Facilitate Health in All Policies Implementation in the Municipality of Kuopio, Finland

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada

2 MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada

3 Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

4 Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

5 Bloomberg School of Nursing University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background 
Health in All Policies (HiAP) encompasses collaboration across government and the consideration of health in various governmental sector’s policies and decisions. Despite increasing advocacy, interest, and uptake in HiAP globally, empirical and evaluative studies are underrepresented in this growing literature, particularly literature on HiAP implementation at the local level. Finland has been a pioneer in and champion for HiAP.

Methods 
A realist explanatory case study design was used to test hypotheses about how HiAP is implemented in Kuopio, Finland. Semi-structured interviews with ten government employees from various sectors were conducted. Data from interviews and literature were analyzed with the aims of uncovering explanatory mechanisms in the form of context- strategy-mechanism-outcome (CSMO) configurations related to implementation strategies. Evidence was evaluated for quality based on triangulation of sources and strength of evidence. We hypothesized that having or creating a common goal between sectors and having committed staff and local leadership would facilitate implementation.

Results 
Strong evidence supports our hypothesis that having or creating a common goal can aid in positive implementation outcomes at the local level. Common goals can be created by the strategies of having a city mandate, engaging in cross-sectoral discussions, and/or by working together. Policy and political elite leadership led to HiAP implementation success because leaders supported HiAP work, thus providing justification for using time to work intersectorally. How and why the wellbeing committee facilitated implementation included by providing opportunities for discussion and learning, which led to understanding of how non-health decisions impact community wellbeing, and by acting as a conduit for the communication of wellbeing goals to government employees.

Conclusion 
At the municipal level, having or creating a common goal, leadership from policy and political elites, and the presence of committed staff can facilitate HiAP implementation. Inclusion of not only strategies for HiAP, but also the explanatory mechanisms, aids in elucidating how and why HiAP is successfully implemented in a local setting.

Keywords


  • epublished Author Accepted Version: February 6, 2022
  • epublished Final Version: February 27, 2022
  1. Donaldson LJ. 125 years of public health in the UK. J R Soc Promot Health. 2001;121(3):146-151. doi:1177/146642400112100310
  2. Jones WK, Hahn RA, Parrish RG, Teutsch SM, Chang MH. Male mortality trends in the United States, 1900-2010: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Public Health Rep. 2020;135(1):150-160. doi:1177/0033354919893029
  3. The Top 10 Causes of Death. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  4. A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians. National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health. https://nccdh.ca/resources/entry/new-perspective-on-the-health-of-canadians. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  5. Achieving Health for All: A Framework for Health Promotion - Canada.ca. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/health-care-system/reports-publications/health-care-system/achieving-health-framework-health-promotion.html. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  6. Ståhl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K. Health in All Policies Prospects and potentials on Health Systems and Policies European. http://hiaconnect.edu.au/old/files/Health_in_All_Policies.pdf.
  7. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health - Final report of the commission on social determinants of health. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-IER-CSDH-08.1. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  8. Fair Society Healthy Lives (The Marmot Review) - IHE. https://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/resources-reports/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  9. Promotion Health. The Helsinki Statement on Health in All Policies. http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/8gchp. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  10. Adelaide Recommendations on Healthy Public Policy the Spirit of Alma-Ata Healthy Public Policy. https://www.who.int/healthpromotion/milestones_ch2_20090916_en.pdf.
  11. Freiler A, Muntaner C, Shankardass K, et al. Glossary for the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013;67(12):1068-1072. doi:1136/jech-2013-202731
  12. Finland curbs childhood obesity by integrating Health in All Policies. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/finland-curbs-childhood-obesity-by-integrating-health-in-all-policies. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  13. Finland EC. Report of the Working Group Exploring the Goals of Health. [Finnish]. 1972.
  14. Kokkinen L, Shankardass K, O'Campo P, Muntaner C. Taking health into account in all policies: raising and keeping health equity high on the political agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(8):745-746. doi:1136/jech-2016-207736
  15. Kokkinen L, Freiler A, Muntaner C, Shankardass K. How and why do win-win strategies work in engaging policy-makers to implement Health in All Policies? a multiple-case study of six state- and national-level governments. Health Res Policy Syst. 2019;17(1):102. doi:1186/s12961-019-0509-z
  16. Shankardass K, Muntaner C, Kokkinen L, et al. The implementation of Health in All Policies initiatives: a systems framework for government action. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):26. doi:1186/s12961-018-0295-z
  17. Puska P, Ståhl T. Health in All Policies-the Finnish initiative: background, principles, and current issues. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:315-328 313 p following 328. doi:1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103658
  18. Melkas T. Health in All Policies as a priority in Finnish health policy: a case study on national health policy development. Scand J Public Health. 2013;41(11 Suppl):3-28. doi:1177/1403494812472296
  19. Aaltonen N, Chydenius M, Kokkinen L. "First, do no harm": have the health impacts of government bills on tax legislation been assessed in Finland? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(8):696-698. doi:15171/ijhpm.2018.39
  20. Health in All Policies - CALPHO. http://www.calpho.org/health-in-all-policies.html. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  21. Ståhl T. Health in All Policies: from rhetoric to implementation and evaluation - the Finnish experience. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(20_suppl):38-46. doi:1177/1403494817743895
  22. Kokkinen L, Muntaner C, O'Campo P, Freiler A, Oneka G, Shankardass K. Implementation of Health 2015 public health program in Finland: a welfare state in transition. Health Promot Int. 2019;34(2):258-268. doi:1093/heapro/dax081
  23. Guglielmin M, Muntaner C, O’Campo P, Shankardass K. A scoping review of the implementation of health in all policies at the local level. Health Policy. 2018;122(3):284-292. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2017.12.005
  24. Van Vliet-Brown CE, Shahram S, Oelke ND. Health in All Policies utilization by municipal governments: scoping review. Health Promot Int. 2018;33(4):713-722. doi:1093/heapro/dax008
  25. Rantala R, Bortz M, Armada F. Intersectoral action: local governments promoting health. Health Promot Int. 2014;29 Suppl 1:i92-102. doi:1093/heapro/dau047
  26. Adelaide Statement on Health in All Policies. health.sa.gov.au/pehs/HiAP/health-lens.htm. Accessed October 17, 2021.
  27. Wismar M. Governance Tools and Framework for Health in All Policies. https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/9047/Finland_Governance_tools_and_framework_HIAP?bidId.
  28. Baum F, Delany-Crowe T, MacDougall C, et al. To what extent can the activities of the South Australian Health in All Policies initiative be linked to population health outcomes using a program theory-based evaluation? BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):88. doi:1186/s12889-019-6408-y
  29. Shankardass K, Solar O, Murphy K, Freiler A, Bobbili S, Bayoumi A, O’Campo P. Health in All Policies: results of a realist-informed scoping review of the literature. In: Getting Started with Health in All Policies: A Report to the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Toronto: Centre for Research on Inner City Health; 2011.
  30. Healthy & Safe Community. https://www.chatham-kent.ca/ckplan2035/about/Pages/Healthy-and-Safe-Community.aspx. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  31. Gase LN, Schooley T, Lee M, Rotakhina S, Vick J, Caplan J. A practice-grounded approach for evaluating Health in All Policies initiatives in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2017;23(4):339-347. doi:1097/phh.0000000000000427
  32. Storm I, Harting J, Stronks K, Schuit AJ. Measuring stages of Health in All Policies on a local level: the applicability of a maturity model. Health Policy. 2014;114(2-3):183-191. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.006
  33. Molnar A, Renahy E, O'Campo P, Muntaner C, Freiler A, Shankardass K. Using win-win strategies to implement Health in All Policies: a cross-case analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0147003. doi:1371/journal.pone.0147003
  34. Baum F, Lawless A, Delany T, et al. Evaluation of Health in All Policies: concept, theory and application. Health Promot Int. 2014;29 Suppl 1:i130-142. doi:1093/heapro/dau032
  35. Pinto AD, Molnar A, Shankardass K, O'Campo PJ, Bayoumi AM. Economic considerations and Health in All Policies initiatives: evidence from interviews with key informants in Sweden, Quebec and South Australia. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:171. doi:1186/s12889-015-1350-0
  36. Shankardass K, Renahy E, Muntaner C, O'Campo P. Strengthening the implementation of Health in All Policies: a methodology for realist explanatory case studies. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(4):462-473. doi:1093/heapol/czu021
  37. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 1997.
  38. Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
  39. Puska P, Vartianen E, Laatikainen T, Jousilahti P, Paavola M. The North Karelia Project: From North Karelia to National Action. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare; 2009.
  40. Ollila E. Health in All Policies: from rhetoric to action. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(6 Suppl):11-18. doi:1177/1403494810379895
  41. Kaikkonen R, Murto J, Pentala-Nikulainen O, et al. Health and Welfare in Finnish Cities and Regions in 2010-2015. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL; 2015. [Finnish].
  42. Helliwell JF, Layard R, Sachs J, De Neve JE. World Happiness Report 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2020.
  43. Where the good life lives. https://www.kuopio.fi/documents/7369547/7699416/Kuopio+Strategy+2030_english.pdf/2d7aead5-74ff-439b-b559-96598b484d04. Accessed October 15, 2021.
  44. O'Campo P, Freiler A, Muntaner C, et al. Resisting austerity measures to social policies: multiple explanatory case studies. Health Promot Int. 2019;34(6):1130-1140. doi:1093/heapro/day073
  45. Christensen J, Bloch P, Moller S, et al. Health in all local policies: lessons learned on intersectoral collaboration in community-based health promotion network in Denmark. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017;34: 216-231. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2620 
  46. Larsen M, Rantala R, Koudenburg OA, Gulis G. Intersectoral action for health: the experience of a Danish municipality. Scand J Public Health. 2014;42(7):649-657. doi:1177/1403494814544397
  47. Greer SL, Lillvis DF. Beyond leadership: political strategies for coordination in health policies. Health Policy. 2014;116(1):12-17. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2014.01.019
  48. Holt DH, Carey G, Rod MH. Time to dismiss the idea of a structural fix within government? an analysis of intersectoral action for health in Danish municipalities. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(22_suppl):48-57. doi:1177/1403494818765705
  49. Muntaner C, Augustinavicius J. Intersectionality: a scientific realist critique. Am J Bioeth. 2019;19(2):39-41. doi:1080/15265161.2018.1557296
  50. Muntaner C. Invited commentary: on the future of social epidemiology--a case for scientific realism. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(6):852-857. doi:1093/aje/kwt143
  51. Muntaner C. Invited commentary: social mechanisms, race, and social epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(2):121-126. doi:1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009970
  52. Muntaner C. Whither occupational class health gradients?: why we need more social class theory, mechanisms, indicators, and scientific realism. Epidemiology. 2019;30(3):445-448. doi:1097/ede.0000000000000994
  53. McLaren L, Ghali L, Lorenzetti D, Rock M. Out of context? Translating evidence from the North Karelia project over place and time. Health Educ Res. 2007;22(3):414-424. doi:1093/er/cy1097
  54. van Eyk H, Baum F, Delany-Crowe T. Creating a whole-of-government approach to promoting healthy weight: what can Health in All Policies contribute? Int J Public Health. 2019;64(8):1159-1172. doi:1007/s00038-019-01302-4

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 06 February 2022
  • Receive Date: 13 May 2021
  • Revise Date: 05 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 05 February 2022
  • First Publish Date: 06 February 2022